Precision Injection Molding Manufacturer · Shenzhen, China

Reducing Sink Marks in an Injection-Molded Housing

Layout test — illustrative case. This fictional example is for testing the case study layout. The customer situation, findings, and results are not a verified Vicmold project record.

A plastic housing had visible sink marks above its internal ribs. This example shows how an engineering team can investigate the issue, agree on a part change, and check new samples before production.

Case Summary

ProjectAppearance improvement for an injection-molded housing
PartPlastic equipment housing — illustrative application
ScopePart review, molding trials, agreed mold modification, and sample inspection
Example outcomeRevised samples accepted against the buyer's agreed appearance requirements
Illustrative image of an engineer inspecting a plastic injection mold

Client Challenge

In this scenario, an equipment manufacturer found shallow depressions on the visible face of a molded housing. The marks appeared opposite internal ribs and remained noticeable under the lighting used for the customer's incoming inspection.

The housing also had to fit an existing assembly. Any change therefore needed to address the appearance problem while preserving the mounting features and agreed dimensions. The buyer supplied the part model, drawing, resin specification, and reference samples for review.

What Vicmold Did

01

Compared the Marks With the Part Design

The example review mapped the visible marks to the rib locations and examined the local wall thickness. The buyer and engineering team agreed which surfaces mattered for appearance and which dimensions had to remain unchanged.

02

Checked the Molding Conditions

Controlled trials examined the effect of packing and cooling conditions using the specified resin. Samples were compared under the same inspection conditions, with checks for flash and dimensional changes as well as surface appearance.

03

Agreed on a Local Design Change

In this fictional example, process adjustments alone did not meet the agreed appearance standard. The proposed change reduced material concentration at the affected rib junctions. The buyer reviewed the effect on fit and function before approving the corresponding mold modification.

04

Inspected Revised Trial Samples

New samples were checked for appearance and the agreed dimensions, then sent to the buyer for assembly review. The approved sample and inspection requirements were recorded before the production order was released.

Project Result

In this illustrative outcome, the revised samples met the buyer's agreed appearance requirements and passed the assembly review. Approval covered the modified part design and the sample submitted for production release.

  • The affected appearance areas and inspection conditions were clearly defined.
  • The buyer approved the design change before the mold was modified.
  • Appearance and assembly were checked together before production release.

This example does not claim a measured reduction in rejects, cost savings, or a guaranteed remedy for other parts.

Article Contents

Request a Quote

Reply within 12 working hours.

Your information is used only to respond to your inquiry. Privacy Policy

HAVE A SIMILAR PROJECT?

Discuss Your Injection Molding Project

Send your drawing, material, and expected quantity. Our factory team will reply within 12 working hours.

Share the Post:
Scroll to Top

Get a Molding
Quote

Custom injection molded parts—from DFM to validated production.

  • DFM feedback in 1 business day
  • Factory-direct pricing, no agent markup
  • 14+ years of molding experience
ISO 9001 · IATF 16949 · ISO 13485
80T–1,500T machines · ISO Class 8 Cleanroom
Prefer direct contact?
Project Inquiry

Request an Injection Molding Quote

Share your drawings, material requirements and production volume. Our team will review your project and reply with a clear next step.

Your information is used only to review and respond to your quote request. It will not be shared with third parties.